Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

Reply Topic: Proposal to Ban GPS Watches from Fell Races

your e-mail address will never be displayed on the site.
B) :( :) :cheer: ;) :P :angry: :unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry: :lol: :sick: :silly: :blink: :blush: :oops: :kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S :evil: :whistle: :pinch:
Enlarge /  Shrink
Enter code here

Topic History of: Proposal to Ban GPS Watches from Fell Races

Max. showing the last 6 posts - (Last post first)
05 Aug 2018 12:33 #19926


DominicShields's Avatar


I am quite concerned that a movement has got underway without first checking that we are all talking about the same thing or even understanding the exact capabilities of the devices in question. This is what I wrote in an email to various people who have been discussing this.
Reading this article I am even more convinced that before any decisions are made there needs to be an exact definition of what we are seeking to ban.
For example, I know many runners who run to a high standard who are perfectly happy with these Garmin GPS running watches that do not have any form of return to start or following uploaded courses

and the extremely popular Forerunner 235 only claims to have the "back to start" feature which could only ever be described as a safety feature, having used this once I had to slow to a walk to follow it - thus making me question the entire premise even though I accept that one try of something does not make me proficient.

There is another issue that does worry me slightly from my experience with golf - some manufacturers of sporting equipment have been known to undertake litigation against sporting bodies they feel are unfairly penalising their products - I put the likelihood of this here as remote but Garmin have huge resources and might start to worry about precedents being set. For example there is a hardcore belief among some that the UKA rules do not permit devices that assist pacing in races and a strict interpretation would seem to by implication ban anything that tells you what pace you are running at. If this was enforced then I suggest that Garmin would be pretty much forced to act.

Time to create page: 0.090 seconds

Website/Forum login

Search this website

Go to top

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  I accept cookies from this site.
EU Cookie Directive Module Information